With the Utah legislative session winding down, lawmakers are considering a proposed law, House Bill 410, that would make Utah more like California and allow motorcycle riders to start traveling “between the lanes.” If you’ve been to California, you have likely seen motorcycles “splitting the lane,” especially when there is a traffic slowdown.
According to KSL News, the Utah legislature is considering allowing this practice – under certain conditions. Those conditions are that the motorcycle needs to be able to pass vehicles safely and go no more than 40 mph. Local physical therapist and motorcyclist Dave Moss, a proponent of the bill, spoke to lawmakers and stated that several studies from around the world show that riding between the lanes can actually be safer than staying in a slow-moving traffic lane. Crashes that happen, he says, also will be less severe. Other byproducts of the proposed law could be increased interest in riding a motorcycle, leading to lower vehicle emissions and less road wear.
Legally speaking, liability would be problematic for a motorcycle rider that gets hit while riding between lanes. Although the law could be changed to actually allow this, the question is whether a reasonable and prudent motorcycle rider would ride this way. At the end of the day, a jury might decide that reasonably prudent motorcyclists should not split lanes and throw the claim out. Same thing for passing on the right: although it’s not illegal to do this in Utah, many people feel that it’s not the reasonable or safe thing to do. As for me, I think allowing this opens the door to motorcyclists going much faster than 40 mph between cars, as I have seen in California. Motorcycle crashes that come from this kind of aggressive driving can be catastrophic.
Ron Kramer is a personal injury practicing law in West Jordan and throughout Utah.
A collision between two semi trucks on I-80 in Parley’s canyon during a heavy snow storm has left one trucker dead. According to the Salt Lake Tribune, the roads were slippery and snow covered on Wednesday night, February 22, 2017, when a truck on the right-hand side of the road began slipping backward. At this time, the driver of a truck hauling crude oil for D&A McRae, began moving around this truck on the left side, going around 15 miles per hour. According to reports, the trucks collided, causing one of the tanker’s tanks to rupture and ignite, spilling crude oil on the road. While the driver of the tanker truck was able to get out unscathed, the driver for Voyager Express, who is from Maricopa, Arizona, sadly lost his life.
The cleanup of the crash left the westbound lanes of I-80 closed for hours as the crude oil burned through the night. This caused major traffic delays in the morning. The cause of the crash is still under investigation.
Legally speaking, drivers of commercial vehicles driving in inclement weather are required to follow trucking regulation 49 C.F.R. §392.14 during inclement weather. The trucking reg states:
Hazardous conditions; extreme caution. Extreme caution in the operation of a commercial motor vehicle shall be exercised when hazardous conditions, such as those caused by snow, ice, sleet, fog, mist, rain, dust, or smoke, adversely affect visibility or traction. Speed shall be reduced when such conditions exist. If conditions become sufficiently dangerous, the operation of the commercial motor vehicle shall be discontinued and shall not be resumed until the commercial motor vehicle can be safely operated.
Many questions remain after this tragic crash: Was the equipment of these trucks in good shape? Did the tires have good tread on them? Should the trucks and trailer have had chains on them? Should the trucks even have been on the road if the drivers were following the above trucking regulation? Had the truckers received appropriate training on best practices in driving during inclement weather? During my CDL training, I learned that many drivers of tractor trailers will simply not drive during hazardous weather until conditions improve. This is a conservative approach, but can keep truckers out of dangerous situations like this.
Additional story here at KSL.com.
In the year 2010, I wrote the blog titled “How To Fire Your Attorney or 50 Ways to Leave Your Lawyer.” Over the years, this blog has been read hundreds of times by people whom I presume are fed up with their lawyer. After all, why would they want to read it if all was well with them and their legal counsel?
Since I wrote it, I have been contacted by people across the United States (and even from Europe) who were wanting to fire their lawyer. And even though we focus only on personal injury law here at the Kramer Law Group, it seems like only a minority of the people who reached out actually had a personal injury case. One thing I learned was that being unhappy with your lawyer is not confined to just one practice area. Indeed, disgruntled clients can be found in almost all practice areas out there.
Sadly, over the last six years, the problems behind people wanting to fire their lawyer remain, and in fact, seems to be escalating. Clients continue to be upset by lawyers who don’t do what they promised, who are not returning phone calls, who are taking money for work they didn’t do, who are rude to their clients, who are “messing up” their clients’ cases, etc. As I expressed in my original blog, while a client is generally free to fire their attorney, doing this in many cases is not always the best call. I’m sure that in many cases, if the lawyer and client were able to sit down together that most of the problems could be resolved. Many, however, don’t have the stomach to do this and are simply “done” with their lawyer, and no amount talking is going to ever fix that.
The Next Step: Get a Second Opinion! Even if you hate your lawyer, keep your head and make sure you can make a change without damaging your case. Although telling off and firing your lawyer in the moment may feel good and “feed the flesh,” the aftermath might be a bitter pill to swallow. So first, Do Your Homework! What I mean is, you want to get a second opinion before you get rid of your lawyer.
If you are unhappy with your lawyer and sitting down with them to discuss your concerns is not an option, I recommend that you first get a “second opinion” with an attorney that practices in the same practice area as your current attorney. These meetings don’t have to cost a lot of money and often might be totally free. For example, a personal injury attorney that works on a contingency fee may agree to meet with you for free, no charge. Even an attorney that charges something for the meeting might well be worth it in the end. But be aware that not every attorney will want to meet with you if you are currently with someone else. They might see you as “damaged goods” or a “red flag” that they instinctively will want to shy away from you.
Under most state’s ethics rules, including Utah’s, however, an attorney can meet with a client who is currently being represented if they are seeing that person to offer a “second opinion” on the facts and applicable law involved in that case. Click here for opinion. You seeing another attorney for a second opinion is not much different than getting a second medical opinion where you want to make sure that the diagnosis or recommended treatment plan for the first doctor is legitimate and reasonable.
One things the Rule (Rules of Professional Conduct 4.2) on this says is that the second opinion of the lawyer should not be used as a way for the lawyer to solicit the case away from the first lawyer. In fact, the opinion says that “the lawyer should make every effort neither to impair the first attorney-client relationship nor to use the consultation as a means of soliciting the represented party.” You are there for information – and the attorney’s opinion – on how they would handle your case if it was in their office.
When I have met with clients, I have told them, in effect, what I would do if this were my case. And this is something you’ll want to ask the attorney you meet with. If it’s a communication problem, ask them how often they stay in touch with their clients how they respond to client phone calls, emails, etc. In other words, ask the attorney about those things you are most concerned with that are happening in your case.
Once you have the benefit of having met with an attorney that practices in the same subject area, then you are in a position to know whether you may have possibly prejudged the attorney or whether they are in fact not doing the job they should be doing in your case. Then you know and you won’t have to second-guess your decision to let your attorney go.
Having been asked to come in as the second (or sometimes third) attorney over the years, I can tell you that the idea of firing an attorney gives most people anxiety. They are not sure it’s going to go well or are worried they won’t “do it right.” I can tell you from experience that the attorney-firing option that clients like the best is when the second attorney handles all those details. This removes much of the anxiety that the client has. When I’ve told the client that I can take care of the “dirty work,” most of them will breathe a sigh of relief.
Now, some timid attorneys might suggest that the client needs to do “the deed” so as to avoid the second attorney getting hit with an attorney lien from the first attorney. (See the discussion about attorney liens here.) To this I would say that the substitute attorney needs to “own up” to the case and be bold about coming in as the replacement attorney. After all, they’ll need to collect all bills, records, reports, statements, photos, etc., that may have been collected by the first attorney. They may even want to have a phone call with that attorney.
And yes, there may be an attorney lien on the case that the first attorney will send to the replacement attorney. This is especially true and applicable in contingency fee, personal injury cases. But this lien amount – whatever it is – will be absorbed by the second attorney. In your personal injury case, it should not increase the total attorney fee that comes out at the end. If the lawyer says that it will increase the amount deducted, then you need to find an attorney that won’t penalize you for your decision to change attorneys.
Finally, I wrote this blog to provide general information to people that might be unhappy with their lawyer. I cannot come into a case like Donald Trump and tell your attorney “You’re fired!” That’s the job of your replacement attorney, as discussed above. You’ll want to get that second opinion mentioned above and ask the attorney the best way to go about replacing your attorney for your state and for your specific legal practice area.
Ron Kramer is the managing attorney at the Kramer Law Group, a Utah personal injury law firm licensed to practice in the state of Utah, Idaho and California.